A Call for Essays from the Catholic Community: Confronting the Threat of Noahidism and Bringing Noahides to Christ

   See Home Page

SevenColorsMinistry@gmail.com

Our ministry is calling upon the Catholic community globally to send us your essays on the Noahide Laws and why they are a threat to the Church and how to bring back Noahides to Jesus. Please email our ministry: SevenColorsMinistry@gmail.com

Maggie Barcelona (USA)

A Call for Essays from the Catholic Community: Confronting the Threat of Noahidism and Bringing Noahides to Christ

As a traditional Catholic ministry rooted in the pre-Vatican II teachings of the Church, we are steadfast in our commitment to the immutable truth that Jesus Christ is the sole path to salvation, as proclaimed in John 14:6: “I am the way, and the truth, and the life; no one comes to the Father except through me.” Our mission is to defend the Catholic faith against theological threats, chief among them the Noahide movement, which promotes the Seven Laws of Noah as a universal moral code for non-Jews, derived from Genesis 9:1–7 and codified in the Talmud (Sanhedrin 56a–b) and by Maimonides (Mishneh Torah, Hilchot Melachim 9:1). While Noahidism presents itself as a benign ethical framework, it poses a grave threat to the Church by rejecting Christ’s divinity, the Trinity, and the necessity of the Church for salvation, while accusing Catholicism of idolatry, blasphemy, and moral failings (Sanhedrin 63b; Mishneh Torah, Hilchot Melachim 9:3). Moreover, its inconsistencies—such as endorsing perpetual Gentile slavery (Gittin 38b; Sotah 3b) and death for non-Jews studying Torah (Sanhedrin 59a)—undermine its claim to universal justice, contradicting the Catholic vision of human dignity (Genesis 1:26–27).

We call upon the Catholic community—traditionalists, mainstream Catholics, scholars, clergy, and laity—to join us in this urgent apostolate by submitting essays that expose the Noahide Laws as a threat to the Church and propose strategies to bring Noahides back to Jesus Christ, the “light of the world” (John 8:12). Your writings will equip the faithful to counter Noahidism’s errors and fulfill the Great Commission to “make disciples of all nations” (Matthew 28:19). We invite essays on a range of topics, including the theological, historical, and moral dangers of Noahidism, the use of Catholic typology and scripture, and evangelization strategies rooted in charity and truth. Below, we offer suggestions to inspire your contributions, but we encourage you to be creative, drawing from your unique insights to strengthen this vital mission. Together, let us defend the Church and lead Noahides to the fullness of salvation in Christ.

---

The Threat of Noahidism to the Church

Noahidism, while small in numbers, poses a significant theological and spiritual threat to the Catholic Church by undermining core doctrines and challenging its universal mission. Its Seven Laws—prohibitions against idolatry, blasphemy, murder, theft, sexual immorality, cruelty to animals, and the establishment of courts (Sanhedrin 56a)—appear moral but are rooted in a Talmudic framework that rejects Christianity. Key threats include:

1. Rejection of Christ and the Trinity: Noahides label the Trinity as idolatrous (shituf, Sanhedrin 63b) and the Incarnation as blasphemous (Deuteronomy 6:4), denying Christ’s divinity and mediatorship (John 10:30; 1 Timothy 2:5). They claim Gentiles need only follow Noahide laws for righteousness (Mishneh Torah, Hilchot Melachim 10:9), contradicting Acts 4:12: “There is salvation in no one else.”
2. Denial of the Church’s Necessity: By asserting that Noahide observance suffices, Noahidism negates the Church’s role as the “sacrament of salvation” (Lumen Gentium 48; Unam Sanctam, 1302). This universalist ethic opposes the Church’s missionary mandate (Ad Gentes 2), risking religious indifferentism, condemned by Pope Pius IX (Syllabus of Errors, 1864).
3. Moral Inconsistencies: Talmudic Noahide laws endorse practices incompatible with Catholic ethics, such as restricting Gentile slave freedom (Gittin 38b), purchasing their children as slaves (Sotah 3b), and prescribing death for non-Jews studying Torah (Sanhedrin 59a). These violate the Noahide prohibitions against theft and murder, exposing hypocrisy and clashing with Gaudium et Spes 27’s condemnation of human dignity violations.
4. Alignment with Vatican II Ambiguities: As noted by Breger and Bemporad (The Forward, 09/22/2015), some Jews propose a document incorporating Noahide Laws to respond to Vatican II’s Nostra Aetate 4, which softened critique of Judaism. This aligns with Noahide anti-blasphemy laws (Sanhedrin 56a), potentially stifling Catholic defense of Christ, paving the way for a “Vatican III” that further erodes doctrinal clarity.
5. Eschatological Concerns: Noahidism’s universalism may prefigure a false religion in end-times prophecies (Revelation 13; 2 Thessalonians 2:3), as its rejection of Christ could mislead souls seeking truth, a danger warned against in Mortalium Animos (1928).

These threats demand a robust Catholic response, exposing Noahidism’s errors and inviting its adherents to Christ, the “Alpha and Omega” (Revelation 22:13).

---

Suggested Topics and Ideas for Essays

Drawing from our prior refutations of Noahidism, we offer the following topics and ideas to guide your submissions, covering theological, historical, scriptural, spiritual, and evangelistic dimensions. We encourage creativity to ensure a diverse and impactful collection.

1. Theological Dangers of Noahidism
   • Idea: Analyze how Noahidism’s rejection of the Trinity and Incarnation (Sanhedrin 63b) undermines Catholic doctrine, using pre-Vatican II sources like the Council of Trent (Session V, on Christ’s mediatorship) or Vatican II’s Lumen Gentium 8 (Christ’s divinity). Highlight Noahide hypocrisy in endorsing slavery (Sotah 3b) while condemning Catholic ethics.
   • Example: Argue that Noahidism’s anti-blasphemy law (Sanhedrin 56a), which may prohibit criticizing Judaism, clashes with Catholic freedom to defend truth (John 8:32), as seen in St. Thomas Aquinas (Summa Theologiae, II-II, q. 10).
   • Creative Prompt: Write a theological dialogue between a Catholic and a Noahide, using scripture (Isaiah 9:6) and tradition (St. Athanasius, On the Incarnation) to refute idolatry charges and invite conversion.
2. Historical Context and Vatican II’s Role
   • Idea: Trace Noahidism’s history from Genesis 9:1–7 to its Talmudic codification (Sanhedrin 56a) and modern revival, contrasting it with Catholicism’s growth as Christ’s Church (Matthew 16:18). Explore how Vatican II’s Nostra Aetate 4, by discouraging Jewish evangelization, opened the door to Noahide influence, as per Breger and Bemporad’s call for a Noahide-based document (The Forward, 09/22/2015).
   • Example: Discuss how pre-Vatican II teachings (Mystici Corporis Christi, 1943) upheld Christ’s necessity, while post-Vatican II ambiguities (Dignitatis Humanae 2) align with Noahide pluralism, risking a “Vatican III.”
   • Creative Prompt: Craft a historical narrative comparing Catholic-Jewish relations pre- and post-Vatican II, proposing how to restore pre-Vatican II clarity (e.g., Satis Cognitum, 1896) to counter Noahidism.
3. Scriptural Insights and Typology
   • Idea: Use Catholic typology to counter Noahide rejection of Christ as the Tanakh’s fulfillment (Sanhedrin 99b). Show how the Passover lamb (Exodus 12; John 1:29), Jonah’s three days (Jonah 1:17; Matthew 12:40), and Isaac’s sacrifice (Genesis 22; Hebrews 11:19) prefigure Christ, refuting Noahide literalism.
   • Example: Cite Luke 24:44 (“Everything written about me… must be fulfilled”) and apostolic exegesis (Acts 8:32–35, Isaiah 53) to defend typology against Noahide claims of eisegesis, supported by Catechism 128–130.
   • Creative Prompt: Write a scriptural commentary on a Tanakh passage (e.g., Psalm 110:1), showing its Christological type and evangelizing Noahides with apostolic methods (Acts 17:2–3).
4. Spiritual Strategies for Evangelization
   • Idea: Explore how Catholic spiritual practices—Eucharist, Rosary, Adoration—strengthen resistance to Noahidism and attract Noahides to Christ. Emphasize the Eucharist as Christ’s real presence (John 6:53–56) against Noahide rejection of the Incarnation, and Marian devotion (Lumen Gentium 66) as a path to Jesus.
   • Example: Argue that the Rosary’s mysteries reveal Christ’s life, countering Noahide idolatry charges, while Adoration fosters encounter with the living God (CCC 1378). Contrast this with Noahide legalism, lacking sacramental grace.
   • Creative Prompt: Compose a spiritual reflection on how a saint (e.g., St. Paul, Acts 26:18) or devotion (e.g., Divine Mercy) can lead Noahides to Christ, weaving in personal or communal experiences.
5. Bringing Noahides Back to Jesus
   • Idea: Propose evangelization strategies rooted in charity (Matthew 5:44) and truth (John 8:32), using scripture (Romans 11:26, “All Israel will be saved”), typology (Isaiah 53), and dialogue (Nostra Aetate 4). Address Noahide concerns (e.g., monotheism) while affirming Christ’s divinity (Colossians 2:9).
   • Example: Suggest sharing testimonies of conversion, as St. Justin Martyr did (Dialogue with Trypho), or using Jewish feasts (e.g., Passover) to show Christ’s fulfillment, inviting Noahides to baptism (CCC 1213).
   • Creative Prompt: Design an evangelization plan for Noahides, combining apologetics (St. Irenaeus, Against Heresies), parish outreach, and intercessory prayer (e.g., Fatima prayers), emphasizing Christ’s universal love (John 3:16).

---

Encouraging Creativity and Unity

While these suggestions provide a framework, we urge you to unleash your creativity, offering fresh perspectives to combat Noahidism and evangelize its adherents. Your unique voice—whether as a theologian, parent, convert, or youth—can illuminate new paths to Christ. Consider these prompts:

• Personal Testimony: Share how your faith countered Noahide arguments, perhaps through a Jewish-Catholic encounter or scriptural discovery.
• Interdisciplinary Approach: Blend theology with philosophy (e.g., natural law), literature (e.g., G.K. Chesterton), or history to refute Noahidism and evangelize.
• Prophetic Lens: Explore Noahidism’s role in end-times scenarios (Revelation 13), using Catholic prophecy (e.g., St. Malachy) to affirm Christ’s triumph.
• Cultural Engagement: Address Noahidism’s appeal in pluralistic societies, proposing evangelization through media, art, or catechesis.

We welcome essays of all styles—scholarly, pastoral, reflective—rooted in Catholic truth. Traditional Catholics are invited to draw on pre-Vatican II sources, such as the Roman Catechism (1566), St. John Chrysostom, or Pope Leo XIII’s Rerum Novarum (1891), to uphold the Church’s perennial teachings. Mainstream Catholics may use Vatican II (Lumen Gentium, Gaudium et Spes) or the Catechism (CCC) for accessibility. Our prior refutations—on Noahide hypocrisy (Gittin 38b), typology (Sanhedrin 99b), and Vatican II’s ambiguities (Nostra Aetate 4)—provide a foundation, but your originality will enrich our mission.

---

Guidelines for Submission

To create a unified resource, we ask that submissions:

• Clearly identify Noahidism’s threats, using scripture, tradition, or reason.
• Propose concrete ways to evangelize Noahides, rooted in charity (1 Corinthians 13:1).
• Specify your perspective (pre-Vatican II, Vatican II, or other).
• Cite sources (e.g., Bible, Talmud, Church documents) for clarity.
• Be submitted to SevenColorsMinistry@gmail.com

Selected essays may be published (with permission) to equip Catholics globally, from parishes to online platforms. We aim to foster dialogue, strengthen faith, and lead souls to Christ.

---

Why Your Voice Matters

Noahidism threatens the Church by denying Christ’s divinity, undermining its mission, and promoting a flawed ethic that contradicts Catholic truth. Yet, every Noahide is a soul beloved by God, called to the fullness of salvation (1 Timothy 2:4). Your essays will arm Catholics to counter these errors and extend Christ’s invitation: “Come to me, all who labor and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest” (Matthew 11:28). The Church Fathers, like St. Augustine (Confessions), and missionaries, like St. Paul (Acts 17:22–31), faced similar challenges, proclaiming Christ against rival systems. Today, we continue their work, guided by the Holy Spirit (John 16:13) and Our Lady, Mother of the Church.

Whether wielding Trent’s clarity or Vatican II’s dialogue, your voice is vital. Join us in exposing Noahidism’s threat and bringing Noahides to Jesus, the “Good Shepherd” (John 10:11). Submit your essays, and let us proclaim together: “Worthy is the Lamb who was slain, to receive power and wealth and wisdom and might and honor and glory and blessing!” (Revelation 5:12).

---

Conclusion

This counter-Noahide Catholic Ministry calls for essays exposing the Noahide Laws as a threat to the Church—through their rejection of Christ (Sanhedrin 63b), denial of the Church’s role (Mishneh Torah, Hilchot Melachim 10:9), moral hypocrisy (Gittin 38b), and alignment with Vatican II ambiguities (Nostra Aetate 4)—and proposing ways to bring Noahides to Jesus. We suggest theological, historical, scriptural, spiritual, and evangelistic topics, but invite creative contributions, from pre-Vatican II rigor to post-Vatican II outreach. Together, let us defend the faith, counter Noahidism’s errors, and lead souls to Christ, the “King of kings and Lord of lords” (Revelation 19:16). May Our Lady, Seat of Wisdom, guide us, that all may know her Son, the Savior of the world (John 4:42).