A Catholic Perspective on President Trump’s Potential Compromise with Noahide Law: A Call for Vigilance
SevenColorsMinistry@gmail.com
A Catholic Perspective on President Trump’s Potential Compromise with Noahide Law: A Call for Vigilance
From a Catholic perspective, rooted in the teachings of the Church as articulated by the Council of Trent, the Roman Catechism (1566), and pre-Vatican II papal encyclicals such as Pope Pius IX’s Syllabus of Errors (1864) and Pope Pius XII’s Mystici Corporis Christi (1943), the Noahide Laws represent a profound theological challenge to the Catholic faith. Derived from Genesis 9:1–7 and codified in the Talmud (Sanhedrin 56a–b) and by Maimonides (Mishneh Torah, Hilchot Melachim 9:1), the Seven Laws of Noah—prohibitions against idolatry, blasphemy, murder, theft, sexual immorality, cruelty to animals, and the establishment of courts—are presented as a universal moral code for non-Jews. However, their rejection of Christ’s divinity, the Trinity, and the necessity of the Church for salvation (Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus, Unam Sanctam, 1302) renders them incompatible with Catholic truth. While President Donald Trump has not publicly acknowledged the Noahide Laws or formed an official alliance with their proponents, a series of documented facts suggest he is surrounded by individuals and groups, particularly the Chabad-Lubavitch movement, that actively promote Noahidism. Given this proximity, the likelihood of his ignorance is slim, raising concerns about potential influence that could compromise his alignment with Catholic principles. This essay analyzes these facts, sourced from credible outlets, to argue that Trump’s associations indicate a vulnerability to Noahide influence, urging Catholics to remain vigilant and oppose any steps toward endorsing this anti-Christian system.
Analysis of Facts and Sources
The following facts, drawn from reputable sources, illustrate Trump’s connections to Noahide advocates and the potential for compromise, despite his lack of public endorsement:
- Ivanka Trump’s Chabad Affiliation: Ivanka Trump, Trump’s daughter and a close advisor, converted to Judaism and is associated with the Chabad-Lubavitch movement, visiting Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson’s grave for prayer. Chabad aggressively promotes the Noahide Laws, viewing them as a global ethic (Likkutei Sichot, Vol. 2). Ivanka’s influence could incline Trump toward Chabad’s agenda, which rejects Christ’s divinity (Sanhedrin 63b).
- Sanhedrin’s Appeals to Trump: The unofficial Sanhedrin, a modern Jewish religious body, called on Trump after his 2016 election to uphold the Noahide Laws and to rebuild the Third Temple under the Noahide Covenant. These appeals, though unanswered publicly, indicate persistent efforts to align Trump with Noahide ideology, which envisions a global theocratic order (Mishneh Torah, Hilchot Melachim 11:4).
- Animal Cruelty Bill and Noahide Claims: Jewish media claimed Trump’s anti-animal cruelty bill (2019) was rooted in Noahide Law, suggesting Jewish groups leverage his policies to validate their agenda. While not explicitly Noahide, this framing indicates an attempt to associate Trump with their principles.
- “Champion of Noahide Law” Claim: On the 2020 election day, an Israel National News writer called Trump a “Champion of Noahide Law.” Though not Trump’s own statement, this reflects a perception among Noahide advocates that he aligns with their goals, increasing the risk of influence.
- Eschatological Warnings: A rabbi on a Noahide court warned that Trump’s 2020 loss would signal the Gog and Magog war, implying his presidency was tied to Noahide eschatology. Such rhetoric positions Trump as a pivotal figure in Noahide prophetic visions, amplifying their efforts to sway him.
- Paula White’s Noahide Engagements: Trump’s faith advisor, Paula White, has engaged with Noahide Jews at Israel365, encouraging Christians to learn from Jews without evangelizing them. This aligns with Noahidism’s view that Gentiles need not convert (Mishneh Torah, Hilchot Melachim 10:9), contradicting the Church’s missionary mandate (Matthew 28:19; Ad Gentes Populos, 1919).
- Noahide Court Demands for 2024: Radical Jewish groups demanded Trump establish Noahide court systems to secure their 2024 vote, suggesting political pressure to adopt Noahide principles, which include anti-Christian penalties (Sanhedrin 59a).
- Rabbi’s Praise for Trump’s Judges: A rabbi praised Trump for appointing “Bible-believing judges,” claiming this upheld Noahide courts, while warning that Biden’s policies would bring divine judgment. This frames Trump’s judicial legacy as Noahide-aligned, raising concerns about future influence.
- Noahide Prayer at Trump Rally: A rabbi delivered a Noahide prayer at a Trump rally, indicating public alignment with Noahide advocates, even if unofficial.
- Proposed Department of Morality: A rabbi urged Trump to create a “Department of Morality” to promote Noahide Law through schools, suggesting a governmental role in advancing Noahidism, which opposes Catholic doctrine (Sanhedrin 63b).
- Noahide Inauguration Prayer: Trump’s 2025 inauguration featured a prayer by Rabbi Ari Berman, who holds a Ph.D. in Noahide Law, signaling Noahide presence at high-profile events.
- Noahide Spread at Inauguration: A Times of Israel blogger suggested Trump’s 2025 inauguration as an opportunity to spread Noahide Law, indicating ongoing efforts to influence his administration.
- Sanhedrin’s International Noahide Court Call: Following the creation of Trump’s White House Faith Office under Paula White, the unofficial Sanhedrin urged him to establish an international Noahide court, escalating demands for global Noahide enforcement.
- Funding Petition: A petition seeks $300 million from Trump to spread Noahide Laws globally through Chabad, highlighting aggressive lobbying efforts.
Analysis of Sources: The sources—Haaretz, Israel National News, Israel365 News, Jerusalem Post, The Lakewood Scoop, Times of Israel, Wikipedia, YouTube, and iPetitions—are credible, ranging from mainstream Jewish media to specialized outlets covering Noahide and Chabad activities. Israel365 News and Israel National News reflect religious Zionist and Noahide perspectives, while Haaretz and Jerusalem Post are respected for their journalistic rigor. The YouTube video and iPetitions provide primary evidence of events and advocacy, and Wikipedia’s entry on Ari Berman is reliable for biographical details. These sources collectively confirm the intensity of Noahide lobbying around Trump, though their bias toward Noahide advocacy requires critical scrutiny to avoid exaggeration.
Catholic Concerns: Theological and Moral Implications
From a Catholic perspective, Noahidism’s rejection of Christ’s divinity and the Church’s necessity (Mystici Corporis Christi, 1943) is heretical, as it denies the necessity of faith in Christ for salvation (Council of Florence, 1442). The Noahide Laws, while appearing moral, include prohibitions against idolatry and blasphemy that condemn Catholic worship of the Trinity and Christ (Sanhedrin 63b; Mishneh Torah, Hilchot Melachim 9:3). The Talmudic interpretations, such as Gittin 38b (restricting Gentile slave freedom) and Sanhedrin 59a (death for non-Jews studying Torah), violate Catholic principles of human dignity and justice (Rerum Novarum, 1891), exposing Noahide hypocrisy in claiming universal ethics.
Trump’s potential compromise with Noahidism, through Chabad’s influence via Ivanka or White’s interfaith engagements, threatens to align him with a system that opposes the Gospel. The Sanhedrin’s calls for Noahide courts and a Third Temple evoke eschatological concerns, as Catholic theology warns of false systems preceding Christ’s return (2 Thessalonians 2:3–4; St. Augustine, City of God, Book XX). The Roman Catechism (Part I, on the Creed) affirms Christ as the fulfillment of all prophecy, and any movement rejecting Him risks leading souls astray (Matthew 24:24). Catholics must be vigilant, as Trump’s openness to religious symbolism, seen in his inauguration prayer (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ari_Berman) and rally events, could lead to policies endorsing Noahide principles, undermining the Church’s mission (Acts 1:8).
Call for Vigilance and Action
While Trump has not officially allied with Noahidism, the facts—his daughter’s Chabad ties, the Sanhedrin’s appeals, White’s Noahide engagements, and public Noahide advocacy—suggest a vulnerability to influence that Catholics cannot ignore. Catholic theology, rooted in Syllabus of Errors (1864), rejects religious indifferentism, insisting that Christ is the sole path to salvation (John 14:6). The Church’s mission, as articulated in Ad Gentes Populos (1919), is to evangelize all, including Noahides, who are called to the fullness of truth in Christ (Romans 11:26).
Catholics must:
- Pray: Intercede through the Rosary and Eucharistic Adoration for Trump’s conversion and resistance to Noahide influence, invoking Our Lady, Mother of God (Roman Catechism, Part IV, on the Hail Mary).
- Educate: Study Noahide errors (Sanhedrin 56a–b) and Catholic truth (Trent, Session V), sharing resources like St. Justin Martyr’s Dialogue with Trypho to counter anti-Christian claims.
- Engage: Dialogue with charity (Matthew 5:44), inviting Noahides to Christ’s Church, using typology (e.g., Isaiah 53; Acts 8:35) to show His fulfillment of the Tanakh.
- Advocate: Oppose Noahide influence in public policy, contacting congresspersons to repeal laws like Public Law 102-14, which symbolically endorse Noahidism, citing First Amendment violations.
Conclusion
President Trump’s lack of public acknowledgment of the Noahide Laws does not absolve the concern that he is compromised, given his proximity to Chabad-Lubavitch, Paula White’s Noahide engagements, and the Sanhedrin’s persistent appeals. The likelihood of his ignorance is slim, as evidenced by Noahide prayers at rallies, inauguration events, and lobbying efforts.From a Catholic perspective, Noahidism’s rejection of Christ (Sanhedrin 63b) and moral inconsistencies (Gittin 38b) threaten the Church’s mission to proclaim the Gospel (Matthew 28:19). Trump’s vulnerability to influence, seen in his faith advisor’s actions and Jewish media’s portrayal, risks aligning him with a system contrary to Catholic truth (Roman Catechism). Catholics must remain vigilant, praying, educating, engaging, and advocating to ensure Christ’s primacy (Acts 4:12), trusting in the Church, the “pillar and bulwark of the truth” (1 Timothy 3:15).
Comments
Post a Comment