Catholic Perspective on Noahide Rejection of Jesus’ Human Form as Idolatry and Refutation (Code Red)

 See Home Page
SevenColorsMinistry@gmail.com

 This article is "Code Red": Idolatry

Catholic Perspective on Noahide Rejection of Jesus’ Human Form as Idolatry and Refutation

The Noahide movement, rooted in Jewish tradition, adheres to the Seven Laws of Noah, which are considered universal moral imperatives for all non-Jews. Among these, the prohibition against idolatry is central, and Noahides often view the Christian belief in Jesus as God incarnate in human form as a violation of this commandment, specifically because it involves worshiping a human figure as divine. This essay explores the Noahide rejection of Jesus’ human form as idolatry, focusing on their belief in the commandment not to worship physical objects or humans as God, and the scriptures they cite to support this position. From a Catholic perspective, it then refutes these claims, demonstrating that worshiping Jesus as God in human form is not idolatry but a fulfillment of God’s revelation, consistent with the Hebrew Scriptures and Catholic theology.

---

Noahide Rejection of Jesus’ Human Form as Idolatry

Noahides, grounded in Jewish monotheism, reject the Christian belief that Jesus is God incarnate, arguing that worshiping a human figure violates the Noahide prohibition against idolatry, which includes worshiping physical objects or beings. Their objections focus on the idea that God, being transcendent and incorporeal, cannot take human form, and venerating Jesus as divine ascribes godhood to a physical, created being. Below are the key elements of the Noahide position, along with the scriptures they cite to support their arguments:

1. God’s Transcendence and Incompatibility with Human Form
   Noahides emphasize God’s absolute transcendence and incorporeality, arguing that He cannot be confined to a physical human body. The idea of God incarnating as Jesus is seen as reducing the infinite Creator to a finite, material form, which they equate with idolatry.
   • Scriptural Basis: Noahides cite Deuteronomy 4:15-18, which warns Israel not to make images of God in any form, including human: “Since you saw no form on the day that the Lord spoke to you at Horeb… beware lest you… make a carved image in the form of anything that the Lord your God has forbidden.” This passage underscores that God has no physical form, and worshiping a human as God violates this principle.
   • Noahide Claim: Jesus, as a historical human figure, cannot be God, and worshiping him ascribes divinity to a physical being, contravening the prohibition against idolatry.
2. Prohibition Against Worshiping Humans as God
   Noahides view the worship of Jesus, a man born in history, as equivalent to deifying a human, which they see as idolatrous. The Noahide law against idolatry, derived from Genesis 9:6 and reinforced by the Torah, forbids ascribing divine status to any created being, including humans.
   • Scriptural Basis: Numbers 23:19 is often cited: “God is not man, that he should lie, or a son of man, that he should change his mind.” This verse emphasizes that God is distinct from humanity, and worshiping a human as God contradicts His divine nature. Similarly, Ezekiel 28:2 condemns the pride of a human claiming divine status: “Because your heart is proud, and you have said, ‘I am a god,’… yet you are but a man, and no god.”
   • Noahide Claim: Veneration of Jesus, who lived as a man, violates the commandment not to worship humans as divine, as it elevates a physical being to the status of God.
3. Rejection of Physical Representations in Worship
   Noahides interpret the Noahide prohibition against idolatry as including the worship of physical objects or beings, such as statues or humans. They view Christian practices like venerating icons of Jesus or the crucifix as idolatrous, as these involve physical representations associated with divine worship.
   • Scriptural Basis: Exodus 20:4-5, part of the Ten Commandments, states, “You shall not make for yourself a carved image, or any likeness of anything… you shall not bow down to them or serve them.” Noahides apply this to Christian devotion to Jesus’ human form, arguing that it involves worshiping a physical entity or its representations.
   • Noahide Claim: Praying to Jesus or using images of him in worship (e.g., crucifixes, icons) is akin to worshiping a physical object, violating the commandment against idolatry.
4. Torah’s Sufficiency and Rejection of Incarnational Theology
   Noahides hold that the Torah is God’s eternal and complete revelation, with no need for additional doctrines like the Incarnation. They argue that the concept of God taking human form is a Christian innovation unsupported by the Hebrew Scriptures.
   • Scriptural Basis: Deuteronomy 13:1-5 warns against prophets who introduce new teachings that lead people away from the Torah: “If a prophet… arises among you… and says, ‘Let us go after other gods,’… you shall not listen to him.” Noahides see the Christian belief in Jesus as God incarnate as such a deviation, equating it to idolatry.
   • Noahide Claim: The Incarnation contradicts the Torah’s teaching on God’s transcendence, and worshiping Jesus as divine introduces a false theology that undermines monotheism.

---

Catholic Refutation of Noahide Claims

From a Catholic perspective, the Noahide rejection of Jesus’ human form as idolatry misunderstands the doctrine of the Incarnation and the nature of Christian worship. Catholics affirm that Jesus is both fully God and fully human, and worshiping him is directed to his divine nature, not his human form as a physical object or mere man. The following refutations address Noahide objections, demonstrating that the Incarnation is not idolatrous but a fulfillment of God’s revelation, consistent with the Hebrew Scriptures.

1. The Incarnation Respects God’s Transcendence
   Noahides cite Deuteronomy 4:15-18 to argue that God’s lack of form precludes a human incarnation. Catholics counter that the Incarnation does not diminish God’s transcendence but reveals His desire to enter human history. The Catholic doctrine of the hypostatic union, defined at the Council of Chalcedon (451 CE), teaches that Jesus is one divine person with two natures—divine and human—united without confusion or division. Worship is offered to Jesus as God, not as a mere physical form.
   • Scriptural Evidence: The Old Testament anticipates divine manifestations in human-like form, such as the “Angel of the Lord” in Genesis 16:7-13 and Exodus 3:2-6, who speaks as God and accepts worship. These theophanies prefigure the Incarnation, where God fully takes human nature (John 1:14: “The Word became flesh”). Isaiah 7:14, which prophesies a child named “Immanuel” (“God with us”), supports the idea of God’s presence in human form, fulfilled in Jesus (Matthew 1:23).
   • Theological Argument: The Incarnation is not a reduction of God to a physical form but an act of divine love, enabling humanity to encounter God personally. The Noahide objection misinterprets the Incarnation as equating God with a human body, whereas Catholics worship Jesus’ divine person, not his physicality alone.
   • Conclusion: The Incarnation is consistent with God’s transcendence, fulfilling rather than contradicting Deuteronomy 4:15-18.
2. Jesus Is Not a Mere Human Deified
   Noahides cite Numbers 23:19 and Ezekiel 28:2 to argue that worshiping Jesus as a man is idolatrous. Catholics respond that Jesus is not a mere human elevated to divine status but the eternal Son of God who assumed human nature. His divinity is intrinsic, not ascribed, as affirmed in John 1:1 (“In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God”).
   • Scriptural Evidence: The Old Testament foreshadows a divine-human figure, such as the “Son of Man” in Daniel 7:13-14, who receives worship and eternal dominion, qualities reserved for God. This figure is identified with Jesus in the New Testament (Mark 14:62). Psalm 45:6-7, addressed to a king, calls him “God” yet distinguishes him from the Father, pointing to the Son’s divine-human identity (Hebrews 1:8-9).
   • Theological Argument: Unlike the human rulers condemned in Ezekiel 28:2, Jesus’ divine claims are validated by his miracles, teachings, and resurrection (John 20:28, where Thomas calls him “My Lord and my God”). The Noahide objection assumes Jesus is only human, ignoring his divine nature, which makes worship of him non-idolatrous.
   • Conclusion: Worshiping Jesus is not deifying a man but acknowledging the eternal Son who took human form, consistent with scriptural foreshadowing.
3. Christian Worship and Icons Are Not Idolatry
   Noahides view Christian devotion to Jesus’ human form and the use of icons as worshiping physical objects, citing Exodus 20:4-5. Catholics distinguish between worship (latria), reserved for God, and veneration (dulia), given to sacred images as pointers to divine realities. The Incarnation justifies the use of images, as God Himself took visible form in Jesus.
   • Scriptural Evidence: The Old Testament permits certain physical representations in worship, such as the bronze serpent (Numbers 21:8-9), which God commanded and which prefigures Christ’s cross (John 3:14-15). The cherubim on the Ark of the Covenant (Exodus 25:18-20) were also divinely sanctioned images used in worship. These examples show that physical symbols, when directed to God, are not idolatrous.
   • Theological Argument: The Second Council of Nicaea (787 CE) affirmed that icons of Jesus are venerated as representations of the incarnate God, not as objects of worship themselves (CCC 2131). Worshiping Jesus involves honoring his divine person, not his physical body as a mere object. The Noahide objection conflates veneration with idolatry, misunderstanding Catholic practice.
   • Conclusion: Christian devotion to Jesus and the use of icons do not violate Exodus 20:4-5 but reflect the reality of the Incarnation, where God entered the physical world.
4. The Incarnation Fulfills the Torah
   Noahides argue that the Incarnation contradicts the Torah’s sufficiency, citing Deuteronomy 13:1-5. Catholics counter that Jesus does not lead people away from the Torah but fulfills its purpose, as he declares in Matthew 5:17: “I have not come to abolish the Law or the Prophets but to fulfill them.” The Incarnation is the culmination of God’s covenantal plan, anticipated in the Torah and Prophets.
   • Scriptural Evidence: Jeremiah 31:31-34 prophesies a new covenant, which Hebrews 8:8-13 applies to Jesus, showing continuity with the Torah. The promise of a divine-human mediator, such as the “prophet like Moses” (Deuteronomy 18:15-18), is fulfilled in Christ (Acts 3:22-23). These passages indicate that God’s plan includes a deeper revelation through the Incarnation.
   • Theological Argument: The Incarnation does not introduce a false god but reveals the God of Israel in human form, enabling humanity to know Him intimately. The Noahide claim misinterprets the Incarnation as a departure from the Torah, whereas Catholics see it as its fulfillment, uniting God’s transcendence with His immanence.
   • Conclusion: The Incarnation upholds the Torah’s authority, making worship of Jesus non-idolatrous.

---

Conclusion

From a Catholic perspective, the Noahide rejection of Jesus’ human form as idolatry stems from a misunderstanding of the Incarnation and Christian worship. Noahides, citing scriptures like Deuteronomy 4:15-18, Numbers 23:19, Ezekiel 28:2, Exodus 20:4-5, and Deuteronomy 13:1-5, argue that worshiping Jesus as God incarnate violates the prohibition against idolatry by ascribing divinity to a human or physical form. Catholics refute these claims by demonstrating that the Incarnation respects God’s transcendence, that Jesus is not a deified human but the eternal Son, that Christian worship and icons are not idolatrous, and that the Incarnation fulfills the Torah’s promises. Far from being idolatry, worshiping Jesus as God in human form is a profound affirmation of God’s love, entering history to redeem humanity, as foreshadowed in the Hebrew Scriptures and realized in the New Testament.