Catholic Perspective: The Validity of Old Testament Poetic Texts in Demonstrating the Incarnation Against Noahide Dismissal

  See Home Page
SevenColorsMinistry@gmail.com

Catholic Perspective: The Validity of Old Testament Poetic Texts in Demonstrating the Incarnation Against Noahide Dismissal

The Noahide movement, rooted in Jewish tradition, promotes the Seven Laws of Noah as a universal moral code for non-Jews, derived from Genesis 9:1–7. Central to their theology is a strict monotheism that rejects Christian claims about the Incarnation, particularly the idea that God would come as a man in Jesus Christ. Noahides often dismiss Christian interpretations of Old Testament texts, including poetic passages, as allegorical or irrelevant to their Torah-centric framework, arguing that these texts lack explicit messianic or divine-human implications. From a Catholic perspective, the poetic texts of the Old Testament—such as Psalms, Proverbs, and other lyrical passages—carry profound theological weight, revealing God’s plan for the Incarnation through inspired imagery, prophecy, and typology. This essay delineates the specific poetic texts previously cited in arguments against Noahides (Psalm 2:7–12, Psalm 45:6–7, Psalm 110:1, Proverbs 8:22–31), explains their validity as divine revelation, and refutes Noahide dismissals by demonstrating their messianic and incarnational significance, grounded in scripture, tradition, and Catholic theology.

---

Catholic Argument: The Validity of Poetic Texts

Catholic hermeneutics, guided by the Holy Spirit, views the Old Testament as a unified revelation pointing to Christ, the fulfillment of the Law and Prophets (Matthew 5:17; Catechism of the Catholic Church [CCC] 112). Poetic texts, such as Psalms and Proverbs, are not merely literary expressions but inspired scriptures that convey divine truths through metaphor, prophecy, and typology (CCC 110). These texts—Psalm 2:7–12, Psalm 45:6–7, Psalm 110:1, and Proverbs 8:22–31—have been cited in prior arguments to demonstrate that the Old Testament foretells God coming as a man in Jesus Christ. Their validity stems from their canonical status, apostolic interpretation, and theological depth, making them resistant to Noahide dismissal. Below, each text is delineated, its incarnational significance is explained, and Noahide objections are refuted.

1. Psalm 2:7–12: The Begotten Son as Divine-Human Messiah

• Text: “I will tell of the decree: The Lord said to me, ‘You are my Son; today I have begotten you. Ask of me, and I will make the nations your heritage… Serve the Lord with fear… Kiss the Son, lest he be angry, and you perish in the way, for his wrath is quickly kindled. Blessed are all who take refuge in him” (Psalm 2:7–12).
• Catholic Interpretation: This royal psalm, traditionally attributed to David, depicts a king anointed by God, called “my Son,” who receives universal dominion and divine honor. The term “begotten” suggests a unique relationship with God, and the call to “kiss the Son” implies worship, a divine prerogative. The New Testament applies this to Jesus, the divine-human Messiah (Acts 13:33; Hebrews 1:5), whose Sonship reflects His eternal generation as God and His human birth (John 1:14; CCC 436). The psalm’s language transcends a human king, pointing to Christ’s incarnational identity as both God and man.
• Validity and Resistance to Dismissal:
  • Canonical Authority: As part of the Psalter, Psalm 2 is divinely inspired (2 Timothy 3:16), carrying equal weight with Torah narratives. The Church Fathers, like St. Justin Martyr (Dialogue with Trypho, ch. 88), saw it as messianic, fulfilled in Jesus’ divine Sonship.
  • Apostolic Witness: The New Testament’s citation (Hebrews 5:5) confirms its messianic intent, showing that early Christians, rooted in Jewish tradition, recognized its incarnational implications. This apostolic interpretation, guided by the Holy Spirit, binds the Church (CCC 86).
  • Theological Depth: The Son’s divine titles and universal rule surpass human kingship, aligning with prophecies like Isaiah 9:6 (“Mighty God”). The call to worship the Son (Psalm 2:12) implies divinity, fulfilled in Jesus’ worship (Philippians 2:10–11).
• Noahide Dismissal and Refutation:
  • Noahide Claim: Noahides may argue that Psalm 2 refers to a human king, like David or Solomon, with “Son” as a metaphorical title for Israel’s kings (2 Samuel 7:14). They dismiss its messianic reading as Christian eisegesis, citing Deuteronomy 6:4 to reject a divine-human figure.
  • Catholic Refutation: The psalm’s universal scope (“the nations your heritage”) and divine honor (“kiss the Son”) exceed the historical Davidic monarchy, pointing to an eternal Messiah (Daniel 7:14). The New Testament’s authoritative application (Acts 4:25–26) refutes the human-only reading. Deuteronomy 6:4’s oneness is preserved in the Trinity, where the Son is consubstantial with the Father (CCC 253). The Church Fathers, like St. Augustine (Expositions on the Psalms, Psalm 2), saw this as a clear prophecy of Christ’s divine-human nature, not easily dismissed as metaphor.

2. Psalm 45:6–7: The King Addressed as God

• Text: “Your throne, O God, is forever and ever. The scepter of your kingdom is a scepter of uprightness; you have loved righteousness and hated wickedness. Therefore God, your God, has anointed you with the oil of gladness beyond your companions” (Psalm 45:6–7).
• Catholic Interpretation: This wedding psalm for a Davidic king addresses him as “God” (Elohim), yet describes him as anointed by God, suggesting a divine-human figure. The eternal throne and anointing point to the Messiah, fulfilled in Jesus, who is both God and the anointed king (Hebrews 1:8–9; CCC 464). The paradox of being “God” and anointed by “God” prefigures the Incarnation, where Jesus is fully divine and human.
• Validity and Resistance to Dismissal:
  • Canonical Authority: As scripture, Psalm 45 carries divine inspiration, and its poetic form enhances, not diminishes, its theological weight (CCC 110). St. Athanasius (Letter to Marcellinus) emphasized the Psalms’ prophetic role in revealing Christ.
  • Apostolic Witness: Hebrews 1:8–9 explicitly applies Psalm 45 to Jesus, affirming its messianic and incarnational significance. This New Testament interpretation, under apostolic authority, anchors its validity (CCC 85).
  • Theological Depth: Addressing a human king as “God” is unprecedented in the Old Testament, suggesting a divine Messiah. The eternal throne aligns with 2 Samuel 7:16, fulfilled in Jesus’ everlasting kingdom (Luke 1:33).
• Noahide Dismissal and Refutation:
  • Noahide Claim: Noahides may argue that “God” is a poetic exaggeration for a human king, reflecting royal hyperbole, not divinity. They cite Numbers 23:19 (“God is not man”) to reject a divine-human Messiah, dismissing the psalm as non-messianic.
  • Catholic Refutation: The direct address “O God” and the eternal throne surpass human kingship, pointing to a divine figure, as confirmed by Hebrews 1:8. Numbers 23:19 emphasizes God’s truthfulness, not a prohibition on the Incarnation, which preserves divine immutability (CCC 469). The psalm’s context within messianic hopes (Psalm 2; Isaiah 9:6) supports its incarnational reading, and St. Cyril of Alexandria (Commentary on the Psalms) saw it as evidence of Christ’s divinity, making dismissal as mere poetry untenable.

3. Psalm 110:1: The Lord Exalted as Divine

• Text: “The Lord says to my Lord: ‘Sit at my right hand, until I make your enemies your footstool’” (Psalm 110:1).
• Catholic Interpretation: Attributed to David, this psalm depicts a king-priest (“my Lord”) exalted to God’s right hand, a divine position. Jesus cites it to affirm His divine identity (Matthew 22:44), and the New Testament applies it to Christ’s ascension (Acts 2:34–35; Hebrews 1:13). The “Lord” being distinct from YHWH yet sharing divine authority suggests a divine-human Messiah, fulfilled in Jesus’ Incarnation and exaltation (CCC 659).
• Validity and Resistance to Dismissal:
  • Canonical Authority: Psalm 110 is divinely inspired, and its messianic significance is rooted in Jewish tradition, as seen in early Christian use (Mark 12:36). St. Justin Martyr (Dialogue with Trypho, ch. 32) used it to argue for Christ’s divinity.
  • Apostolic Witness: The New Testament’s frequent citation (Hebrews 7:17; 1 Corinthians 15:25) confirms its messianic intent, showing that first-century Jews recognized its theological weight. The Church’s Magisterium upholds this interpretation (CCC 86).
  • Theological Depth: The exaltation to God’s right hand and priestly role (Psalm 110:4, “after the order of Melchizedek”) transcend human kingship, aligning with Daniel 7:13–14’s divine “Son of Man.” This points to Jesus’ divine-human nature.
• Noahide Dismissal and Refutation:
  • Noahide Claim: Noahides may argue that “my Lord” refers to a human king or priest, like David or Melchizedek, not a divine figure. They cite Deuteronomy 6:4 to reject a second divine person, dismissing the psalm as poetic honor, not incarnational prophecy.
  • Catholic Refutation: The phrase “my Lord” (adoni) in David’s voice implies a superior, and the divine context (“sit at my right hand”) suggests divinity, fulfilled in Jesus (Acts 2:34). Deuteronomy 6:4 is upheld in the Trinity’s unity (CCC 234), and the psalm’s priestly imagery (Psalm 110:4) aligns with Hebrews 7:17, confirming Christ’s divine role. St. Augustine (Expositions on the Psalms, Psalm 110) saw it as a clear Trinitarian prophecy, resisting dismissal as mere royal praise.

4. Proverbs 8:22–31: Wisdom as Preexistent and Incarnate

• Text: “The Lord possessed me at the beginning of his work, the first of his acts of old… When he established the heavens, I was there… I was beside him, like a master workman, and I was daily his delight, rejoicing before him always, rejoicing in his inhabited world and delighting in the children of man” (Proverbs 8:22–31).
• Catholic Interpretation: Wisdom, personified as preexistent and delighting in humanity, prefigures the Word (Logos) incarnate in Jesus, the Wisdom of God (1 Corinthians 1:24). Wisdom’s role in creation and intimacy with God suggests a divine person who becomes human, fulfilled in Christ’s Incarnation (John 1:1–14; CCC 2500). The text’s poetic form enhances its theological depth, revealing God’s plan to dwell with humanity.
• Validity and Resistance to Dismissal:
  • Canonical Authority: Proverbs, as Wisdom literature, is inspired scripture (2 Timothy 3:16), and its personification of Wisdom reflects divine revelation. St. Athanasius (Against the Arians, Discourse 2) linked Proverbs 8 to Christ’s preexistence.
  • Apostolic Witness: The New Testament’s identification of Jesus as Wisdom (Colossians 2:3) confirms Proverbs 8’s messianic significance. Early Christians, steeped in Jewish tradition, saw Wisdom as the preincarnate Christ (CCC 112).
  • Theological Depth: Wisdom’s preexistence (“before the hills,” Proverbs 8:25) and creative role align with Genesis 1:1 and Psalm 33:6, fulfilled in the Word’s incarnation (John 1:3). The delight in humanity foreshadows Jesus’ human ministry.
• Noahide Dismissal and Refutation:
  • Noahide Claim: Noahides may argue that Wisdom is a poetic metaphor for God’s attribute or Torah, not a divine person, citing Ecclesiastes 1:9 to dismiss speculative readings. They reject incarnational interpretations as Christian additions, invoking Numbers 23:19.
  • Catholic Refutation: Wisdom’s personal attributes—speaking, rejoicing, and acting as a “master workman”—suggest a divine entity, fulfilled in Jesus (John 1:1). Numbers 23:19 addresses God’s truthfulness, not the Incarnation, which preserves divine nature (CCC 469). Jewish tradition, like Wisdom of Solomon 7:25–26, personifies Wisdom similarly, and St. Irenaeus (Against Heresies, Book IV, ch. 20) saw Proverbs 8 as Christological, making dismissal as mere metaphor difficult.

---

Why These Poetic Texts Cannot Be Easily Dismissed by Noahides

The validity of Psalm 2:7–12, Psalm 45:6–7, Psalm 110:1, and Proverbs 8:22–31 rests on their divine inspiration, historical interpretation, and theological coherence, making them resistant to Noahide dismissal. Below, overarching reasons for their enduring significance are outlined, addressing Noahide tendencies to downplay poetic texts:

1. Divine Inspiration and Canonical Status
   • The Catholic Church affirms that all Old Testament texts, including poetic ones, are inspired by God (2 Timothy 3:16; CCC 105–107). Psalms and Proverbs are not secondary to the Torah but part of the unified canon, carrying equal authority. Noahides, who revere the Hebrew Bible, cannot dismiss these texts as mere poetry without undermining their own scriptural foundation. The Church Fathers, like St. Jerome (Commentaries on the Psalms), emphasized the Psalter’s prophetic role, and Wisdom literature’s inclusion in Jewish tradition (e.g., Sirach) supports its theological weight.
2. Messianic Expectation in Jewish Tradition
   • Jewish tradition, even pre-Christian, recognized messianic themes in Psalms. The Targum on Psalm 2 and Psalm 110 interprets them as referring to the Messiah, and Midrash Tehillim sees Psalm 45 as messianic. This historical context undermines Noahide claims that these texts are solely historical or metaphorical. The apostolic witness (Acts 13:33; Hebrews 1:8) builds on this tradition, showing continuity, not invention. Proverbs 8’s Wisdom was linked to the Messiah in Jewish thought (e.g., Philo, On the Creation), aligning with Christian exegesis.
3. New Testament Fulfillment and Apostolic Authority
   • The New Testament’s application of these texts to Jesus—Psalm 2 in Acts 4:25–26, Psalm 45 in Hebrews 1:8–9, Psalm 110 in Matthew 22:44, and Proverbs 8 in Colossians 2:3—reflects apostolic authority, guided by the Holy Spirit (John 16:13; CCC 85). Noahides may reject the New Testament, but its roots in first-century Judaism, where messianic hopes were vibrant, lend credibility to its interpretations. The early Church, composed of Jewish believers, saw these texts as fulfilled in Jesus’ divine-human nature, making dismissal as Christian eisegesis untenable.
4. Theological Coherence with Old Testament Revelation
   • These poetic texts cohere with broader Old Testament themes, such as theophanies (Genesis 18:1–2), messianic prophecies (Isaiah 9:6), and typologies (Genesis 22), all pointing to God’s incarnational plan. Psalm 2’s divine Son aligns with Daniel 7:13–14’s “Son of Man,” Psalm 45’s “God” king with Jeremiah 23:5–6’s “Lord,” and Psalm 110’s exalted Lord with Zechariah 12:10’s pierced God. Proverbs 8’s Wisdom parallels Genesis 1:1’s creative Word, fulfilled in John 1:1. This cumulative witness resists Noahide reductionism, as the texts interlock with Torah and prophetic promises.
5. Poetic Form Enhances, Not Diminishes, Truth
   • Noahides may dismiss poetry as figurative, but Catholic theology views poetic language as a vehicle for profound divine truths (CCC 110). The Psalms’ lyrical form conveys messianic hope, and Proverbs’ Wisdom imagery reveals God’s eternal plan. St. Thomas Aquinas (Summa Theologiae, I, q. 1, a. 9) noted that scripture’s metaphorical language elevates spiritual understanding, as seen in Psalm 110’s exalted imagery or Proverbs 8’s personified Wisdom. Dismissing these as “mere poetry” ignores their inspired purpose, affirmed by Jesus’ use of Psalms (Luke 24:44).

---

Addressing Noahide Dismissal Strategies

Noahides often employ specific strategies to dismiss these poetic texts, which Catholics can counter effectively:

• Strategy: Allegorical Reduction
  • Noahides may claim that Psalms are allegorical praises for human kings, and Wisdom is a literary device, not prophetic.
  • Catholic Response: The texts’ divine and universal language (e.g., Psalm 2:8’s “nations,” Proverbs 8:23’s “before the ages”) transcends human contexts, pointing to Christ. The New Testament’s messianic application (Hebrews 1:5) and Jewish messianic traditions (Targum Psalms) confirm their prophetic intent.
• Strategy: Torah-Centric Exclusivity (Deuteronomy 13:1–5)
  • Noahides may argue that only the Torah defines doctrine, and poetic texts are secondary, citing warnings against new teachings.
  • Catholic Response: The entire Old Testament, including Psalms and Proverbs, is inspired (CCC 120). Deuteronomy 13:1–5 does not apply, as Jesus’ resurrection (Acts 2:32) validates His fulfillment of scripture (Luke 24:44). The Church Fathers, like St. Irenaeus (Against Heresies, Book III, ch. 5), saw poetic texts as integral to God’s revelation.
• Strategy: Rejection of Divine-Human Messiah (Numbers 23:19)
  • Noahides may cite “God is not man” to reject a divine-human Messiah in these texts.
  • Catholic Response: Numbers 23:19 addresses God’s truthfulness, not the Incarnation, which preserves divine immutability (CCC 469). Texts like Isaiah 7:14 and Zechariah 12:10 show God taking human form, fulfilled in Jesus’ hypostatic union.

---

Conclusion

The poetic texts of Psalm 2:7–12, Psalm 45:6–7, Psalm 110:1, and Proverbs 8:22–31 are valid and indispensable witnesses to the Old Testament’s revelation of God coming as a man in Jesus Christ. Their canonical authority, apostolic interpretation, and theological coherence—depicting a divine-human Messiah with eternal rule, divine titles, and preexistent Wisdom—make them resistant to Noahide dismissal. Psalm 2’s begotten Son, Psalm 45’s God-king, Psalm 110’s exalted Lord, and Proverbs 8’s Wisdom cohere with broader scriptural themes, from Genesis 3:15 to Zechariah 12:10, pointing to the Incarnation (CCC 464). Noahide objections—allegorical reduction, Torah exclusivity, and rejection of a divine-human figure—are refuted by the texts’ inspired status, Jewish messianic traditions, and the New Testament’s fulfillment in Christ (Acts 13:33; Hebrews 1:8). The Catholic Church, guided by scripture, tradition, and the Magisterium, affirms these poetic texts as divine revelations, urging Noahides to recognize Jesus as the incarnate Word, fulfilling their scriptures’ deepest promises of salvation for all nations (Genesis 22:18). Catholics can confidently engage Noahides, proclaiming the poetic Psalter and Proverbs as inspired witnesses to the God-man, Jesus Christ.