Why do Noahides accuse Christians of Blasphemy? (Code Orange)
SevenColorsMinistry@gmail.com
This article is "Code Orange": Blasphemy
Under Noahide Law, Christianity is not only idolatry but blasphemy. Remember, Jesus was tried for blasphemy by the Sanhedrin. What exactly makes Jews call Christians blasphemers? Below is their argument of Christian supersessionism which they claim negates the words of God in the Torah and also the Catholic response.
The Noahide Accusation
Supersessionism and Rejection of the Eternal Covenant
Noahides, aligned with Jewish theology, believe that the Torah represents God’s eternal covenant with Israel, unchanging and irrevocable. They view Christian supersessionism—the belief that the New Covenant through Jesus replaces the Mosaic Covenant—as a rejection of God’s promises to Israel. This is seen as blasphemous because it implies that God’s word in the Torah is no longer sufficient.
Noahides, aligned with Jewish theology, believe that the Torah represents God’s eternal covenant with Israel, unchanging and irrevocable. They view Christian supersessionism—the belief that the New Covenant through Jesus replaces the Mosaic Covenant—as a rejection of God’s promises to Israel. This is seen as blasphemous because it implies that God’s word in the Torah is no longer sufficient.
- Noahide Claim: Passages like Jeremiah 31:31-34 (promising a new covenant) are interpreted as a renewed commitment to the Torah, not its replacement. Christianity’s claim that Jesus fulfills or supersedes the Torah undermines God’s eternal law.
- Conclusion: By negating the Torah’s permanence, Christianity commits blasphemy against God’s unchanging revelation.
The Catholic Response
Response to Supersessionism
The Catholic Church, rejects strict supersessionism, affirming the enduring covenant with Israel while maintaining that Jesus fulfills the Torah’s purpose for all humanity.
The Catholic Church, rejects strict supersessionism, affirming the enduring covenant with Israel while maintaining that Jesus fulfills the Torah’s purpose for all humanity.
- Scriptural Evidence: Jeremiah 31:31-34’s new covenant is fulfilled in Jesus (Luke 22:20, Hebrews 8:8-13), but this does not annul God’s promises to Israel (Romans 11:29). St. Paul teaches that the Gentiles are grafted into Israel’s covenant through Christ (Romans 11:17-24), not that Israel’s covenant is revoked.
- Theological Argument: The Church teaches that the Old Covenant finds its ultimate meaning in Christ, who universalizes salvation (John 4:22, “salvation is from the Jews”). The Noahide view misunderstands fulfillment as replacement, ignoring the continuity of God’s plan.
- Conclusion: Christianity does not negate the Torah but reveals its universal scope through Jesus, the Messiah.
Comments
Post a Comment