Catholics Must Stop Education and Sharing Day! - A Call to Action! - Email your local officials! Plan protests!

 

 See Home Page
SevenColorsMinistry@gmail.com

Education and Sharing Day will be on March 29th, 2026 and Catholics must finally rise up to put an end to this. We are asking all Catholics to send the below email (or write your own email) to your local, state, and federal districts, asking questions as to what their plans are for Education and Sharing Day and how to go about lodging a complaint and protesting these events. Please gather information and send it to SevenColorsMinistry@gmail.com so that we can start to organize a campaign against this travesty.

PLEASE EMAIL THIS LETTER TO YOUR LOCAL OFFICIALS

To Whom It May Concern,
I am a concerned Catholic who lives in your district and would like to bring a matter to your attention. On March 29th, 2026, the US federal government and other state and local governments will celebrate Education and Sharing Day, a time to commemorate the life work of Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson. Who was Rabbi Schneerson and what was his life work? Rabbi Schneerson was highly active in making non-Jews aware of the Noahide Laws, a set of statutes from the Talmud which apply mandatorily to non-Jews. Earlier renditions of the Education and Sharing Day proclamation from the federal government mentioned these Noahide Laws in connection to Rabbi Schneerson's efforts to educate the public about them and states that they are the foundation of American civilization. Current state, town, and local government proclamations on Education and Sharing Day often still mention the Noahide Laws as a foundation block of American society or bring up the Noahide Laws during associated activities on the day. What are the Noahide Laws and why are they concerning to Catholics? The first Noahide Law outlaws idolatry. According to Jewish tradition, the worship of Jesus Christ as God can be seen as idol worship. The second Noahide Law is no blasphemy, and to claim Jesus is God can be seen as blasphemy to Jews. There are supposed to be punishments for breaking these laws, which can include beheading. Regardless of the fact that these Education and Sharing Days don't institute Noahide Law, the concept of recognizing these laws as foundational to America is offensive and dangerous to Catholics. These proclamations set a precedent that our Nation is a Noahide Nation, and this precedent could be used later to ill effect in claiming America was founded upon anti-Christian laws. However, even though the Noahide Laws no longer appear in federal proclamations, these proclamations still revere Rabbi Schneerson who made negative comments about gentiles, stating that non-Jewish souls stemmed from satanic powers and that the fetus of a non-Jew was almost the property of Jews (quotes below). As a Catholic, I am concerned about the upcoming Education and Sharing Day and would like to make inquiry into how to stop this tradition. Could you please contact me back with any information on what your town, local, state, or federal government has planned for Education and Sharing Day, and who I may contact to lodge an official complaint and start the process of protesting this event?

Please Contact Me Back

SHNEERSON'S ANTI-GENTILE QUOTES IN CONTEXT:

As found in Jewish Fundamentalism in Israel by Israel Shahak and Norton Mezvinsky

THE NATIONAL RELIGIOUS PARTY 59 

Rebbe," Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, who headed the Chabad movement and wielded great influence among many religious Jews in Israel as well as in the United States. Schneerson and his Lubovitch followers are Haredim; nevertheless, they involved themselves in Israel's political life and shared many concepts with Gush Emunim and the NRP. The ideas of Rabbi Schneerson that appear below are taken from a book of his recorded messages to followers in Israel, tided Gatherings of Conversations and published in the Holy Land in 1965. During the subsequent three decades of his life until his death, Rabbi Schneerson remained consistent; he did not change any of the opinions. What Rabbi Lubovitch, Hassidic belief.  

Scheerson taught either was or immediately became official, 
Regarding the non-Jew the Lubovitcher Rebbe's views were clear even if a bit disorderly: "In such a manner the Halacha, stipulated by the Talmud, showed that a non-Jew should be punished by death if he kills an embryo, even if the embryo is non- Jewish, while the Jew should not be, even if the embryo is Jewish. As we [the talmudic sages] learn from Exodus 22:21, beginning with the words 'and if any mischief will follow.'" This quoted verse is a part of a passage beginning in verse 21, describing what should be done "if men strive and hurt a woman with child," thus Lubovitcher Rebbe, says in full: "And if any mischief will follow, damaging the embryo. Verse 22, whose beginning is quoted by the the wording "life for life" instead of "soul for soul.") The above then you shall give soul for soul." (Some English translations use The Lubovitcher Rebbe continued: stated difference in the punishment of a Jew and a non-Jew for the same crime is common in the Talmud and Halacha. 

do not have a case of profound change in which a person is merely The difference between a Jewish and a non-Jewish person stems from the common expression: "Let us differentiate." Thus, we on a superior level. Rather, we have a case of "let us differenti- ate" between totally different species. This is what needs to be said about the body: the body of a Jewish person is of a totally different quality from the body of [members] of all nations of the world ... The Old Rabbi [a pseudonym for one of the holy Lubovitch rabbis] explained that the passage in Chapter 49 of Hatanya [the basic book of Chabad] : "And you have chosen us" [by God], because a choice is thus made between outwardly [the Jews] means specifically that the Jewish body was chosen similar things. The Jewish body "looks as if it were in substance similar to bodies of non-Jews," but the meaning ... is that the bodies only seem to be similar in material substance, outward look and superficial quality. The difference of the inner quality, 

60 JEWISH FUNDAMENTALISM IN ISRAEL  

however, is so great that the bodies should be considered as completely different species. This is the reason why the Talmud states that there is an halachic difference in attitude about the bodies of non-Jews [as opposed to the bodies of Jews]" "their bodies are in vain." ... An even greater difference exists in regard to the soul. Two contrary types of soul exist, a non-Jewish soul comes from three satanic spheres, while the Jewish soul stems from holiness.  

As has been explained, an embryo is called a human being, because it has both body and soul. Thus, the difference between a Jewish and a non-Jewish embryo can be understood. There is also a difference in bodies. The body of a Jewish embryo is on a higher level than is the body of a non-Jew. This is expressed in the phrase "let us differentiate" about the body of a non-Jew, which is a totally different kind. The same difference exists in the soul of a non-Jewish embryo. We therefore ask: Why should regard to the soul: the soul of a Jewish embryo is different than a non-Jew be punished if he kills even a non-Jewish embryo while a Jew should not be punished even if he kills a Jewish embryo? The answer can be understood by [considering] the general difference between Jews and non-Jews: A Jew was not created as a means for some [other] purpose; he himself is the purpose, since the substance of all [divine] emanations was created only to serve the Jews. "In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth" [Genesis 1:1] means that [the heavens and the earth] were created for the sake of the Jews, who are called the "beginning." This means everything, all developments, all discoveries, the creation, including the "heavens and the earth - are vanity compared to the Jews. The important things are the Jews, because they do not exist for any [other] aim; they themselves are [the divine] aim."  

After some additional cabbalistic explanation the Lubovitcher Rebbe concluded: 
Following from what has already been said, it can be understood why a non-Jew should be punished by death if he kills an embryo between the embryo and a [baby that was] born is that the and why a Jew should not be punished by death. The difference either it is subsidiary to its mother or to the reality created after embryo is not a self-contained reality but rather is subsidiary; In its present state the purpose is still absent. A non-Jew's entire birth when the [divine] purpose of its creation is then fulfilled. reality is only vanity. It is written, "And the strangers shall stand and feed your flocks" [Isaiah 61:5]. The entire creation [of a non- Jew] exists only for the sake of the Jews. Because of this a non-Jew  

THE NATIONAL RELIGIOUS PARTY 61  

should be punished with death if he kills an embryo, while a Jew, whose existence is most important, should not be punished with death because of something subsidiary. We should not destroy an important thing for the sake of something subsidiary. It is true that there is a prohibition against [hurting] an embryo, because it is something that will be born in the future and in a hidden only when visible matters are affected; as previously noted, the form already exists. The death penalty should be implicated embryo is merely of subsidiary importance.